Design Amid : Design + Lifestyle Magazine

 

 

 

Login / Register
Home / Cover | Masthead | Categories | Advertise | DA Awards | Contents | + Submit an Article or News June 22, 2017

Strategies for Not Loosing Design Awards


Strategies for Not Loosing Design Awards

This article explains how not to get eliminated from design awards and competitions, i.e. strategies for winning design awards.

Why designers fail at design awards, competitions and contests? No one joins a design award, competition or contest knowing that she would definitely not win. However, designers still submit designs that would be obviously eliminated. Based on statistics regarding 5000+ design submissions to a design competition, the following are insights explain why designers lose design awards.
Not Reading the Brief: Major failure. It has become evident that a significant percentage of designers are indeed not reading the competition briefs at all. The brief of a competition, and its the terms and agreements are the most two important documents that must be definitely read prior to starting a design or its submission. Most design awards would have generic briefs, or simple award categories.
Yet many designers, not reading the category definitions or requirements could submit designs that do not fit the competition. This especially happens a lot for free to join competitions, as designers seem to be more careful when registration fees are involved. In any case, for a success in design awards, first thing to do is to read the competition brief or the category descriptions.
Poor Presentation: Designers often fail competitions mostly because the graphic communication of their entries are not good or their presentation is poorly made: For many designers, the presentation is an irrelevant or underrated aspect of a submission. Designers most often think that it is the design that is being judged; not its graphic communication. However, in reality, jury members can be biased and favor designs which have better presentation.
There are three major reasons for that: firstly, a well-made presentation suggest that the design project itself is also well-made and professional, this is indeed a proven phenomenon and mainly happens because as a good first impression creates an anchoring effect towards positive perception of the design.
Secondly, designs that have a better presentation are usually easier to understand and it is again proven that easier to understood designs are evaluated more positively as they create less of a mental burden.Third, presentation is indeed an important evaluation criteria in most competitions, and this mere fact could be missed easier. Thus, designs with better presentation end up getting better results in design awards and competitions.
Ambiguous Design: If jury members do not understand the designs they are judging in a reasonable amount of time, they will either simply pass it or fail it or not judge it at all, but more often, to be on the safe side, competition judges will fail any designs that are not clearly communicated. Clear communication is not just about good quality aesthetic presentation; it is more about letting judges understand what the submitted design is, how it works, and how it relates to the environment i.e. In addition to the quality of the graphic visualization; the actual design of the presentation is very important.
Within this perspective, it is especially important for designers to communicate their designs very clearly with the submitted presentation, and accompanying descriptions if possible. There are several questions that each design presentation should clearly answer with graphic means, if not possible verbally: Most important of all, the function should be communicated and easy to understand; it is possible to do so by preparing illustrations, showing the design within its context of use, through demonstrating its usage etc.
Not Respecting Submission Guidelines: A third important reason why designers fail design awards and competitions is because they forget to read submission guidelines or decide for themselves that the entry requirements would not be relevant. While on one hand, for local competitions and amateur design contests this could be true, on the other hand, for international design awards and prestigious competitions, not respecting submission guidelines usually gets the designs eliminated.
Designers are especially required to submit their works in a uniform, standardized manner so that they could be judged on equal grounds; submission requirements of a design competition usually imposes restrictions for presentation format and size, amount of content that could be submitted or requires that specific aspects of the design that is communicated. Thus, for designers to succeed at design awards and competitions, guidelines shall always be respected.
Copyright & Intellectual Property Issues: Yet another reason why designers fail design awards and competitions relates to the usage of logos of famous brands and utilization or embedding of others' licensed works without permissions. More often, logo usage is observed for conceptual designs; designers like to relate their designs to that of a famous brand, they do so by incorporating world famous logos.
While most competitions would not have a problem with such behavior, professional awards and competitions have big issues when it comes to trademarks especially because good design awards, unlike local competitions, do publicity, publish yearbooks and distribute press releases which could attract the attention of brands, and could potentially cause legal issues and problems if they do not feel the way their trademarked, protected logos are used on designs that they did not have control over. Meanwhile, on the other hand, likewise, artists would not be happy to see their own creations embedded on the background of others designs, or models would not be happy to see themselves on designs that they do not relate to and not paid for. Thus, it is the interest of organizers to remove any copyright infringing material; even if the material is indeed itself not submitted for the awards.
Technical & Logistics problems: If the organizers did never receive your design, your chances of winning is none. Designers should make sure that their applications are indeed received and approved by the organizers. In some conditions, there could be some material that is lacking, in others there could be legal documents to be signed or fees to be paid or confirmations to be made.In other conditions, digital files could get corrupt, products could be lost or broken during shipment. No matter what, it is the designers responsibility to make sure that the designs are received by the organizers, has been included in the competition and will appear at results, be presented at the exhibition etc.
Overdoing: In some conditions it is seen that some participants do literally send dozens of designs to a design competition. When the projects are good and appealing, this is a pleasure for the organizer. However when the submitted designs are not so appealing but most importantly similar or variations of each other, it could lead to overall elimination of the participant from the event because it really tires the judges to see same things over and over.
Given this perspective, it should not be misinterpreted as a suggestion of not to submit multiple projects to an award; indeed submitting multiple varied designs increases your chances of winning. However, submitting variations of a design simply does the opposite. Designers are suggested to choose their best, distinct designs and submit only designs that they are certain of.
Identifiable: In most competitions, submissions are blindly judged, therefore adding the name, logo or copyright details to the presentations, pictures and images could lead to elimination of submitted works since it would make the competition not fair. In addition, it has also been observed at competitions that some over enthusiastic participants would try to get contact with judges or organizers to try to communicate their designs earlier. In most competitions, this kind of behavior results with the disqualification, therefore designers are advised to refrain from submitting identifiable works.
Eligibility Conditions: This could look obvious, and therefore I almost omitted to mention it, however a significant proportion of entry eliminations occur because the participants do not match the eligibility requirements stated by the organizers. Many competitions are open to students only, others could be local, some might impose an age restrictions, others will ask you to be a member of a professional association, and some will require you have a specific degree. Eligibility conditions shall be read in advance to avoid unnecessary loss of time.
I especially did not find the need to mention strategies for winning awards; because in essence such strategies should not be necessary for good awards. When participating a fair design competition, the only think a designer should focus on is doing a good work. In any case competition conditions should be already obeyed.
Since the above criteria are the most common reasons why designers do fail competitions, it should be suggested that organizers take some precautions and perhaps some necessary steps to decrease the number of eliminated entries such as providing each participant a submission guide, or actively filtering entries and letting participants know etc.
Yet in essence here are the main reasons why designers do succeed in competitions: 1. Good design, 2. Good presentation, 3. Competition brief or category compliance, terms & agreements, eligibility conditions, and entry requirements are matched and fulfilled. If a designer fills all the criteria above, the chances of winning is really great.

This article was added on Monday, 27th of January, 2014 at 08.26 am by author Onur Cobanli Tags: winning an award, losing an award, design award strategy, losing design awards, elimination from design competitions. Read our copyright policy here.
 

VIA:

www.designcompetition.com

 

YOU MIGHT ALSO LIKE:


Furnitures of a Concrete City

Fuori Salone 2016, From the Inside Out

A walk through Zona Tortona Fuorisalone 2015: insight from a Product Design student

Judging Design Contests

Versus

Workshop Fuorisalone 2016

FUORISALONE: a world of curiosity among the streets in Milan

Brera Design District

Milan Furniture Fair 2016

Salone del Mobile in Milan: where dream comes true

Inside and outside

Out of the Salon In the Design

Design for Needs

How to Publish Your Works

Coinnovation: Coin-novation and Co-innovation through design competitions and contests

CLICK HERE TO SEE EVEN MORE

 

SEARCH

 
Random Article
» Furnitures of a Concrete City
Advertisements
A' Design Award

CATEGORIES

Furniture, Decorative Items and Homeware Design
Packaging Design
Architecture, Building and Structure Design
Fashion, Apparel and Garment Design
Lighting Products and Lighting Projects Design
Toy, Games and Hobby Products Design
Digital and Electronic Devices Design
Interior Space and Exhibition Design
Vehicle, Mobility and Transportation Design
Interface and Interaction Design
Home Appliances Design
Graphics and Visual Communication Design
Computer Graphics and 3D Model Design
Photography and Photo Manipulation Design
Engineering and Technical Design
Scientific Instruments, Medical Devices and Research Equipment Design
Movie and Animation Design
Food, Beverage and Culinary Arts Design
Building Materials, Construction Components, Structures & Systems Design
Social Design
Idea Design
Arts, Crafts and Ready-Made Design
Meta, Strategic and Service Design
Unexpected Design
Information Technologies Design
Hardware, Power and Hand Tools Design
Young Design
Heavy Machinery Design
Performing Arts, Style and Scenery Design
Music, Audio and Sound Design
Writing, Literature and Content Design
Excellence in Design
Diligence and Intelligence in Design
Actor, Talent and Model Design
Hospitality, Recreation, Travel and Tourism Design
Futuristic Design
Social and Behavioral Sciences Design
Natural Sciences and Mathematics Design
Awards, Prize and Competitions Design
Event and Happening Design
Sports, Entertainment and Recreation Equipment Design
Textile, Fabric, Textures, Patterns and Cloth Design
Safety Clothing and Personal Protective Equipment Design
Beauty, Personal Care and Cosmetic Products Design
Chemical Products and Consumables Design
Sales, Contact Center and Customer Service Design
Pet Supplies and Products for Animals Design
Banking and Finance Instruments Design
Jewelry, Eyewear and Watch Design
Bakeware, Tableware, Drinkware and Cookware Design
Baby, Kids' and Children's Products Design
Fashion and Travel Accessories Design
Art Materials, Stationery Supplies and Gift Items Design
Prosumer Products, Tools, and Machinery Design
Security and Surveillance Products Design
Bathroom Furniture and Sanitary Ware Design
Manufacturing and Processing Machinery Design
Energy Products and Devices Design
Business Plan and Corporate Operational Plans Design
Information Processing Tools Design
Street Furniture Design
Landscape Planning and Garden Design
Urban Planning and Urban Design
Human Resources and HR Programs Design
Education and Training Content Design
Yacht and Marine Vessels Design
Car and Land Based Motor Vehicles Design
Agriculture, Horticulture and Fisheries Design
Aerospace and Aircraft Design
Multidisciplinary and Interdisciplinary Design
Core Resources Manufacturing and Extraction Design
Spacecraft, Spaceplanes and Spaceship Design
Generative, Algorithmic and Parametric Design
Digital and Broadcasting Media Design
Print and Published Media Design
Construction and Real Estate Projects Design
Musical Instruments Design
Differently Abled and Seniors' Assistance Design
Public Awareness, Volunteerism, and Society Design
Governance and Public Services Design
Creative Legacy, Retro and Evergreen Design
Cultural Heritage and Culture Industry Design
Luxury Design
Mobile Technologies, Applications and Software Design
Advertising, Marketing and Communication Design
Creative Industry and Lifelong Design
Cybernetics, Prosthesis and Bio-Engineering Design
Radical Innovation and New Technologies Design
Wearable Technologies Design
Engineering, Construction and Infrastructure Design
Footwear, Shoes and Boots Design
Furniture Accessories, Hardware and Materials Design
Limited Edition and Custom Design
Design Quality and Innovation
Sustainable Products, Projects and Green Design
Design for X
3D Printed Forms and Products Design
Disposable and Single-Use Product Design
Website and Web Design
Ease of Use and Universal Design
Adult Toys and Products Design
Methods, Techniques and Strategies Design
Legwear, Pantyhose and Hosiery Design
Industrial Design
Spatial Design
Graphics Design
Strategic Design
Interaction Design
Structured Product Design
Advanced Design and Design Research
Concealed, Hidden and Secret Design

PAGES

698.Maison Summiers first design is selected for Masterly, the Dutch in Milano during the Salone del Mobile
For Index, click here.
Google Advertisements
More Advertisements
Design Competition
Design Mega Store
OMC Design Studios
Copyrights ©2017 | Privacy Policy | Sitemap | RSS Feed | Register | Login